'Iliad as a war literature Essay\r'

'Homer’s epic poetry, â€Å"The Iliad,” is probably one of the best stories that declaim us about war. In this poem, we chit-chat humans struggleing with humans, gods fighting with humans, and however gods fighting with gods. Even though it was do some period around the seventh century BC, we can associate with our innovational warfargon. In Homer’s â€Å"Iliad,” we feel how the gods garbled the race in fighting their birth wars, just homogeneous how governmental leading of different countries manipulate their army to fight another country.\r\nWe can also knock against that new-fangled wars, just like the trojan horse war in â€Å"the Iliad,” can be caused by small matters which were just winded up to huge proportions by those who manipulate these wars. The book can be seen as Homer’s perspective of war. It is just about an anti-war literature because it showed how wars ordinarily end. Both sides disoriented great lives , including some of their respected heroes. In the Greeks’ side, they broken Achilles’ best friend, Patroclus (23. 1-7). On the Trojans’ side, they lost their prince, intimidate (24. 21-23).\r\nAchilles eventually died some time after, when he was shot by Paris, Hector’s chum salmon in the firedog of his foot which was his weakness. It showed that no one very reigns victorious, even after winning the war. This is because twain sides suffer great losses, not merely in properties, but also the lives of those who ar involved in the war, both armies and civilians. nearly military postures towards war that Homer demonstrateed in Iliad were the possible motives of engaging in wars. The closely evident motive in the Trojan War was to retrieve the wife of Menelaus, the brother of the Greek King Agamemnon.\r\nThey decided to arrange an all out war, deploying a pass away of more than a thousand ships in order to retrieve Helen (of troy weight) who w as abducted by a Trojan prince, Paris (3. 29-31). Another attitude towards war shown in this epic poem was the preventative by higher powers. With the incumbrance of the Olympian gods and goddesses, the war to regain Helen of Troy was blown up to greater proportions. It became a personal war for these gods and goddesses, especially when they chose to back out sides between the Trojans and the Greeks.\r\nThe gods and goddesses who took the side of the Greeks include Hera, Athena, Poseidon, and Hermes (4. 37-49). On the other hand, the gods who took the side of the Trojans include Aphrodite, Apollo, Artemis, and Leto (1. 10-15). They indorse up the soldiers whenever they fight and argon normally the ones who decide on how the fight would end. whole Zeus remained in the middle, wherein he forbade the intervention of these gods in the war. Homer was able to depict a war which is similar to our modern day warfare.\r\nHis depiction of gods was like the semipolitical leading of vari ous nations who would encourage their people to engage in wars against other nations. These are the leaders who are not physically in battle, but are the ones who actually dictate how the wars would go. Also, the wars that they often start would ordinarily mean great losses for both warring sides. The reasons for these wars were very much the same(p) like that of Homer’s â€Å"the Iliad. ” These are usually small things which could be work by negotiations, but the pride of the leaders is usually the ones that fuel the war.\r\nLeaders like Menelaus and Agamemnon are the same as the political leaders that we have today, who prefers violent negotiations alternatively than peaceful means to solve conflicts. This usually leaves the country with great problems, like loses of lives and stead and a bad economy.\r\nWorks Cited: Homer. â€Å"The Iliad”. 2006. igniter Notes. October 15 2007. <http://pd. sparknotes. com/lit/iliad/section2. html>. Sienkewicz, Tom. â€Å"The Gods in the Iliad”. 2002. October 15 2007. <http://department. monm. edu/classics/Courses/CLAS210/CourseDocuments/Epic/gods_in_the_iliad. htm>.\r\n'