The Major Issues and Conflicts on Bilingual Education

bilingualist education was first initiated in 1968. It was a new means to educate the children who spoke a minority lecture. 31 forms later the equal problems exist for those children who verbalize a actors line other therefore position. The experiment of Bilingual education has been a hardship and now its while to move on. The first side scarce initiatives were brought forrard in 1981 by newly elected president Reagan. Since and so the negate over Bilingual education has drove on.Currently twenty-three says bugger off side Only laws with 4 states having laws that atomic number 18 pending. The issue of bilingualist education and the conflict that surrounds it is primarily focused between whites and Hispanics, although since the mid 70s its in addition been involved with the Chinese and Mung cultures. Bilingual education has failed however, currently the movement is towards and English moreover educational system. The unsophisticated fact of the consider is th at people who speak a language in this country exit never get ahead.Weve tested the ignorant spirit that you could get by without speech production English or speech English very minimally, simply thats promoting and even more ignorant head which is that you dont need speak English fluently to pull through in the States. In 1968 we didnt know that Bilingual Education wouldnt work, however, its time to move on and do the objurgate involvement and switch to English Only. Lyndon John tidings was president, we had the futile dream of world peace, at the same time we were Bombing the North Vietnamese into the stone-age.In the final year of LBJs presidency sever new education initives were taken as part of the last step in his Great Society programs. angiotensin-converting enzyme of these new initives was Bilingual education. At the time it was supported by the large-minded whites in this country, for the most part the conservative Hispanic sect was unconnected to such measure s. The motif at the time was, kids would learn in their indispens sufficient language and simply pick up English gradually. Those ideas were radicalized in the 1970s however, the premise moved away from gradual learning of English to English wasnt truly necessary.In 1981 Bilingual education came under assault from newly elected president Reagan proposed moving to the English Only system. The idea wasnt viewed as Anti-Hispanic at the time, or as some kindhearted of racist proposal. Reagan was adored by a majority of the Hispanic community, gulp unprecedented support among Latino voters. The issue of bigotry wasnt brought forth until the Democrats were sent packing in Gingerich revolution of 1994. In 1999 the debate rages on a nonher 4-5 states ar preparing for an English Only law to go on the 2000 Election ballots.The assault on Bilingual Education will go by on. There have been several attempts to put an English Only amendment in to the constitution, all have failed. However , as public support for English only hits record highs an amendment maybe inevitable. The latest of the states to abolish Bilingual education was the state of California non exactly a conservative state by any means. The controversial Prop 227 was passed by a significantly full(a) margin 61% to 39%.Prop. 227 was headed by Millionaire computer executive Ron Unz himself the son of immigrant p arents. During the battle to pass Prop 227 Unz was called everything from a sell out to a White supremacist. The surrounding Bilingual education is now fueled by a Hispanic minority that renounce to adjust to the Statesn culture. They refuse to see the facts, Americans who do non speak English fluently have a poverty rate nearly 25% higher then Americans who speak fluent English.Their arguments are unsubstanciated, English only laws are non racist in nature. Theyre attempting to create better equality a theory that you simply can non call racist. By making children of parents who speak a mi nority language speak English, the people who are really benefiting are the children. By allowing children to think its perfectly ok to use their indwelling languages in our society is promoting ignorance and poverty. American is run in English, twenty-four states disoblige all their information in nothing and English.To say that communicate another language and knowing very little English will get you anywhere in this country is stupid. Diversity is wonderful, however, it belongs in homes and not in our schools. American culture is speaking English and only English. America was formed on certain principals lad out with certain constitutional underlying assumptions, it always wasnt possible for everyone to speak English, but the image was that this is America and we speak English here. There are basically fiver arguments coming from opponents of English only education.They say it ignores our countries civil rights tradition it fails to fight the integration of minority citiz ens into the American mainstream it loses the need for American merchants to be able to communicate with foreign markets it restricts the ability of the giving medication to be able to make up all its citizens as well as it raises constitutional concerns. The main supporters economically of Bilingual Education are the educators. The NEA and various other education groups fagged nearly twice as practically money trying to defeat Prop 227 in California then the groups supporting the initive spent.Why would they do this? Its simple, MONEY, Bilingual education creates jobs for teachers and valued funding, no matter how right something is, teachers simply dont turn against teachers. The thousands of positions bilingual education has created are now being eliminated. The only way they can preserve these jobs is by claiming that English only legislation is racially motivated and instills hostility towards minority groups who use another language other then English.Im firmly in favor of English only. First, Bilingual education does not ignore our countries civil rights tradition. Its simply stating that if you want to be ignorant, break in poverty, collect welfare and detract from society, thats fine but you will do it on our terms. To say America also has a civil rights tradition is also questionable. Is this not the country where slavery was permitted for three hundred years, where women couldnt vote, and where abortions are readily available.Peoples civil rights are being infringed on all the time, from a black slave to an unborn baby, there is no tradition of great civil rights in America. The flake argument, it fails to provide integration of minority citizens into the mainstream is ridiculous. Whats more mainstream American a new Chinese immigrant speaking Chinese or one speaking English? The notion that allowing someone to speak a native language, is pitch them in to the mainstream is insane.Third, it doesnt neglect the American Government from reach ing its citizens. This is AMERICA were associated with English, we speak English, Thomas Jefferson wrote the Declaration of Independence in English, our laws are passed in English. Maybe if you cant speak our language you dont belong in our country. Its also not the Governments duty to reach out to the citizens, people are suppose to be self reliant, we dont want the Government to reach into our lives. Thats why we had that little revolution against King George.If you really need the Governments assistance you should reach out to them, something that would be pretty hard if you dont speak English. Fourth, it does not neglect the ability of merchants to interact with foreign markets. We were dealing with foreigners a long time before Bilingual education and we will be doing so a long time after its elimination. Translators Now thats a noble idea, more practical then allowing 300 languages to exist. Its also cheaper. Finally, our Constitution is written in English and since 1908 print ed exclusively in English by the United States Government.Teddy Roosevelt said in 1908 that To print the American Constitution in any other language but English, would be like spitting in the face of our forefathers. The Untied States Supreme mash has also ruled numerous times that English only laws do not violate the 1st amendment of our Constitution. I personally believe that in our nation there needs to be a main language, not 3 or 4 or 1200. George Washington wasnt giving orders at Valley Forge in Russian he was speaking English. Abe Lincoln didnt give the Gettysburgh Address in Portuguese.Its not to much to ask for every American citizen to be able to speak English fluently. No one is forced to live here, and if you refuse to adapt you probably shouldnt be living here. If you want to speak German by all means go ahead and do so, but do it back in Germany. While youre in America however, we speak English, and if you dont know it youre in trouble. The conflict is over rated. Its not a matter of racism or of any other kind of hatred. Its a simple matter of principle. Americans speak English its not to much to ask.